<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Response from Mitch Ratcliffe on the &#8220;How to get Google to fix BlogSpot&#8221; Issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fightsplog.com/news/index.php/2005/10/response-from-mitch-ratcliffe-on-the-how-to-get-google-to-fix-blogspot-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fightsplog.com/news/index.php/2005/10/response-from-mitch-ratcliffe-on-the-how-to-get-google-to-fix-blogspot-issue/</link>
	<description>Fighting back against the blog spammers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 10:05:49 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tired Of Paying Too Much For Google Adwords? &#124; 7Wins.eu</title>
		<link>http://www.fightsplog.com/news/index.php/2005/10/response-from-mitch-ratcliffe-on-the-how-to-get-google-to-fix-blogspot-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-7982</link>
		<dc:creator>Tired Of Paying Too Much For Google Adwords? &#124; 7Wins.eu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 07:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightsplog.com/news/index.php/2005/10/response-from-mitch-ratcliffe-on-the-how-to-get-google-to-fix-blogspot-issue/#comment-7982</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Royal Pingdom » Smart and funny use of Google AdwordsThe growing pains of NGEDIT » Blog Archive » ViEmu, adwords and clickfraud Google Bans Lingerie Ads For &#8220;Sexual&#8221; Content | AccuraCast Search Daily NewsFight Splog » Response from Mitch Ratcliffe on the &#8220;How to get Google to fix BlogSpot&#8221; I&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeChongq</title>
		<link>http://www.fightsplog.com/news/index.php/2005/10/response-from-mitch-ratcliffe-on-the-how-to-get-google-to-fix-blogspot-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeChongq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightsplog.com/news/index.php/2005/10/response-from-mitch-ratcliffe-on-the-how-to-get-google-to-fix-blogspot-issue/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Would imposing some quality controls really be that difficult?  How about not running Ads from sites that have been banned from Google&#039;s index.  It seems to me that would be a very simple and automated way to improve AdSense.

Obviously Google cannot monitor the contents of every site that uses AdSense, but there are certain terms that may be more prone to abuse that should be looked at.  My example of ads for Firefox and Mozilla are only annoyances.  There are far worse abuses out there.

How about ads for spamming software?  We need to get that into the hands of more people who don&#039;t know what they are doing right?  Those websites don&#039;t explain what you are buying is spamming software.  They make it sound like a totally legitimate way to increase your traffic and trick a lot of buyers.

This comment turned out really long so I turned the rest of it into its own&lt;a href=&quot;http://chongq.blogspot.com/2005/10/how-not-to-fix-blogspot-issue.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;post on my blog&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would imposing some quality controls really be that difficult?  How about not running Ads from sites that have been banned from Google&#8217;s index.  It seems to me that would be a very simple and automated way to improve AdSense.</p>
<p>Obviously Google cannot monitor the contents of every site that uses AdSense, but there are certain terms that may be more prone to abuse that should be looked at.  My example of ads for Firefox and Mozilla are only annoyances.  There are far worse abuses out there.</p>
<p>How about ads for spamming software?  We need to get that into the hands of more people who don&#8217;t know what they are doing right?  Those websites don&#8217;t explain what you are buying is spamming software.  They make it sound like a totally legitimate way to increase your traffic and trick a lot of buyers.</p>
<p>This comment turned out really long so I turned the rest of it into its own<a href="http://chongq.blogspot.com/2005/10/how-not-to-fix-blogspot-issue.html" rel="nofollow">post on my blog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
